High charge density metallophosphate molecular sieves

ABSTRACT

A family of highly charged crystalline microporous metallophosphate molecular sieves designated PST-16 has been synthesized. These metallophosphates are represented by the empirical formula of:
 
R p+   r A m   + M x E y PO z  
 
where A is an alkali metal such as potassium, R is an organoammonium cation such as ethyltrimethylammonium, M is a divalent metal such as zinc and E is a trivalent framework element such as aluminum or gallium. The PST-16 family of molecular sieves are stabilized by combinations of alkali and organoammonium cations, enabling unique metalloalumino(gallo)phosphate compositions and exhibit the CGS topology. The PST-17 family of molecular sieves has catalytic properties for carrying out various hydrocarbon conversion processes and separation properties for separating at least one component.

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a Division of Application Ser. No. 15/588,967 filed May 8, 2017, which application claims priority from Provisional Application No. 62/341,174 filed May 25, 2016, now expired, the contents of which cited applications are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

This invention relates to a family of charged metallophosphate-based molecular sieves designated PST-16. They are represented by the empirical formula of: Rp+rA+mM2+xEyPOz where A is an alkali metal such as potassium, R is at least one quaternary ammonium cation such as ethyltrimethylammonium, M is a divalent metal such as zinc and E is a trivalent framework element such as aluminum or gallium. The PST-16 family of materials has the CGS topology.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Zeolites are crystalline aluminosilicate compositions which are microporous and which are formed from corner sharing [AlO_(4/2)]⁻ and SiO_(4/2) tetrahedra. Numerous zeolites, both naturally occurring and synthetically prepared are used in various industrial processes. Synthetic zeolites are prepared via hydrothermal synthesis employing suitable sources of Si, Al and structure directing agents (SDAs) such as alkali metals, alkaline earth metals, amines, or organoammonium cations. The structure directing agents reside in the pores of the zeolite and are largely responsible for the particular structure that is ultimately formed. These species balance the framework charge associated with aluminum and can also serve as space fillers. Zeolites are characterized by having pore openings of uniform dimensions, having a significant ion exchange capacity, and being capable of reversibly desorbing an adsorbed phase which is dispersed throughout the internal voids of the crystal without significantly displacing any atoms which make up the permanent zeolite crystal structure. Zeolites can be used as catalysts for hydrocarbon conversion reactions, which can take place on outside surfaces of the zeolite as well as on internal surfaces within the pores of the zeolite.

In 1982, Wilson et al. developed aluminophosphate molecular sieves, the so-called AlPOs, which are microporous materials that have many of the same properties of zeolites, but are silica free, composed of [AlO_(4/2)]⁻ and [PO_(4/2)]⁺ tetrahedra (See U.S. Pat. No. 4,319,440). Subsequently, charge was introduced to the neutral aluminophosphate frameworks via the substitution of SiO_(4/2) tetrahedra for [PO_(4/2)]⁻ tetrahedra to produce the SAPO molecular sieves (See U.S. Pat. No. 4,440,871). Another way to introduce framework charge to neutral aluminophosphates is to substitute [M²⁺O_(4/2)]²⁻ tetrahedra for [AlO_(4/2)]⁻ tetrahedra, which yield the MeAPO molecular sieves (see U.S. Pat. No. 4,567,029). It is furthermore possible to introduce framework charge on AlPO-based molecular sieves via the introduction both of SiO_(4/2) and [M²⁺O_(4/2]) ²⁻ tetrahedra to the framework, giving MeAPSO molecular sieves (See U.S. Pat. No. 4,973,785).

In the early 1990's, high charge density molecular sieves, similar to the MeAPOs but without the Al, were developed by Bedard (See U.S. Pat. No. 5,126,120) and Gier (See U.S. Pat. No. 5,152,972). These metal phosphates (sometimes arsenates, vanadates) were based on M²⁺ (M=Zn, Co), the general formula of which, in terms of the T-atoms, T²⁺−T⁵⁺, was approximately A⁺T²⁺T⁵⁺O₄, having framework charge densities similar to Si/Al=1 zeolites and were charge balanced by alkali cations, A⁺, in the pores. Later attempts to prepare metallophosphates of similar compositions but with organic SDAs led to porous, but interrupted structures, i.e., the structures contained terminal P—O—H and Zn—N bonds (See J. Mater. Chem., 1992, 2(11), 1127-1134.) Attempts at Al substitution in a zincophosphate network was carried out in the presence of both alkali and organoammonium agents, specifically the most highly charged organoammonium species, tetramethylammonium, but because of the high framework charge density, only the alkali made it into the pores to balance framework charge (See U.S. Pat. No. 5,302,362). Similarly, in a high charge density zincophosphate system that yielded the zinc phosphate analog of zeolite X, the synthesis in the presence of Na⁺ and TMA⁺ yielded a product that contained considerably less TMA⁺ than Na⁺ (See Chem. Mater., 1991, 3, 27-29).

To bridge the rather large charge density gap between the MeAPOs of U.S. Pat. No. 4,567,029 and the aforementioned alkali-stabilized Me²⁺-phosphates of Bedard and Gier, Stucky's group developed a synthesis route using amines, often diamines in ethylene glycol solvent. They were able to make high charge density, small pore MeAPOs in which the concentrations of Co²⁺ and Al³⁺ in R(Co_(x)Al_(1−x))PO₄ were varied such that 0.33≤x≤0.9 in the so-called ACP series of materials, the aluminum cobalt phosphates (See Nature, 1997, 388, 735). Continuing with this synthesis methodology utilizing ethylene glycol solution matching the amines to framework charge densities for R(M²⁺ _(x)Al_(1−x))PO₄, such that 0.4≤x≤0.5, (M²⁺=Mg²⁺, Mn²⁺, Zn²⁺, Co²⁺) the large pore materials UCSB-6,-8 and -10 were isolated (See Science, 1997, 278, 2080). Crystal dimensions isolated from that work were often on the order of hundreds of microns. Similarly, this approach also yielded MeAPO analogs of zeolite rho of the composition RM²⁺ _(0.5)Al_(0.5)PO₄, where R═N, N′-diisopropyl-1, 3-propanediamine, M²⁺=Mg²⁺, Co²⁺ and Mn²⁺. Cowley followed this ethylene glycol-based strategy to prepare the cobalt and zinc gallium phosphates using quinuclidine as the SDA, that have the CGS topology and a framework charge density of −0.125/T-atom (See Microporous and Mesoporous Materials 28, 1999 163-172). Similarly, Lin and Wang used 1,2 diaminocyclohexane (DACH) with the ethylene glycol approach to prepare a Zn—Ga phosphate of CGS topology with higher Zn incorporation than the Cowley work, realizing a framework charge density of −0.25/T-atom for (H₂DACH)Zn₂Ga₂(PO₄)₄ (See Chemistry of Materials, 12, 2000 3617-3623). The reliance of these synthesis approaches on an ethylene glycol solvent does not lend itself well to industrial scale, from both a safety and environmental point of view. Other than this work, there has been little activity in this intermediate charge density region, where 0.2≤x≤0.9 for the [M²⁺ _(x)(Al, Ga)_(1−x)PO₄]^(x−) compositions.

Pursuing aqueous chemistry, Wright et al. used highly charged triquaternary ammonium SDAs to make new MeAPO materials (See Chem. Mater., 1999, 11, 2456-2462). One of these materials, STA-5 with the BPH topology, (Mg_(2.1)Al_(11.9)P₁₄O₂₈), exhibited significant substitution of Mg²⁺ for Al³⁺, up to about 15%, but less substitution than seen in Stucky's non-aqueous ethylene glycol approach.

More recently, Lewis et al. developed aqueous solution chemistry using quaternary ammonium cations leading to high charge density SAPO, MeAPO, and MeAPSO materials, enabling greater substitution of SiO_(4/2) and [M²⁺O_(4/2)]²⁻ into the framework for [PO_(4/2)]⁺ and [AlO_(4/2)]⁻, respectively, using the ethyltrimethylammonium (ETMA⁺) and diethyldimethylammonium (DEDMA⁺) SDAs. These materials include ZnAPO-57 (U.S. Pat. No. 8,871,178), ZnAPO-59 (U.S. Pat. No. 8,871,177), ZnAPO-67 (U.S. Pat. No. 8,697,927), and MeAPSO-64 (U.S. Pat. No. 8,696,886). The relationship between the increasing product charge densities and reaction parameters, namely the ETMAOH(DEDMAOH)/H₃PO₄ ratios, were outlined in the literature (See Microporous and Mesoporous Materials, 189, 2014, 49-63). The incorporation of M²⁺ observed in these systems was such that for the formulation [M²⁺ _(x)Al_(1−x)PO₄]^(x−) , x˜0.3, about 30% substitution of Al and a framework charge density of −0.15/T-atom.

Applicants have now synthesized a new family of highly charged metallophosphate framework materials, designated PST-16, with higher charge densities than the MeAPOs of U.S. Pat. No. 4,567,029 and the ZnAPO materials isolated by Lewis. Contrary to the work cited above in which high framework charge density metallophosphates are prepared from amines in ethylene glycol solution, the current materials are prepared from aqueous solution utilizing a combination quaternary ammonium and alkali cations. The PST-16 materials have the CGS topology (See Database of Zeolite Structures, www.iza-structure.org/databases) and exhibit a range of framework charge densities that are greater than those observed by Cowley and comparable to or higher than those observed by Lin and Wang. The utility of alkali in metalloaluminophosphate-based systems is uncommon and in combination with quaternary ammonium cations under the right conditions enables this system to achieve the charge densities and desired midrange compositions between the low charge density MeAPOs of U.S. Pat. No. 4,567,029 and high charge density M²⁺-phosphate extremes.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

As stated, the present invention relates to a new family of metallophosphate molecular sieves designated PST-16. Accordingly, one embodiment of the invention is a microporous crystalline material having a three-dimensional framework of [M²⁺O_(4/2)]²⁻, [EO_(4/2)]⁻ and [PO_(4/2)]⁺ tetrahedral units and an empirical composition in the as synthesized form and on an anhydrous basis expressed by an empirical formula of: Rp+rA+mM2+xEyPOz where R is at least one quaternary ammonium cation selected from the group consisting of ethyltrimethylammonium (ETMA⁺), diethyldimethylammonium (DEDMA⁺), hexamethonium (HM²⁺), choline [Me₃NCH₂CH₂OH]⁺, trimethylpropylammonium, trimethylbutylammonium, trimethylisopropylammonium, tetramethylammonium (TMA⁺), tetraethylammonium (TEA⁺), tetrapropylammonium (TPA⁺) and mixtures thereof, “r” is the mole ratio of R to P and has a value of about 0.1 to about 1.0, “p” is the weighted average valence of R and varies from 1 to 2, A is an alkali metal such as Li⁺, Na⁺, K⁺, Rb⁺ and Cs⁺ and mixtures thereof, “m” is the mole ratio of A to P and varies from 0.1 to 1.0, M is a divalent element selected from the group of Zn, Mg, Co, Mn and mixtures thereof, “x” is the mole ratio of M to P and varies from 0.2 to about 0.9, E is a trivalent element selected from the group consisting of aluminum and gallium and mixtures thereof, “y” is the mole ratio of E to P and varies from 0.1 to about 0.8 and “z” is the mole ratio of O to P and has a value determined by the equation: z=(m+p·r+2·x+3·y+5)/2 and is characterized in that it has the x-ray diffraction pattern having at least the d-spacings and intensities set forth in Table A:

TABLE A 2Θ d(Å) I/I₀ % 8.28-8.06 10.67-10.96 vs 10.83-10.64 8.16-8.31 w 11.68-11.47 7.57-7.71 w-m 12.49-12.15 7.08-7.28 m-vs 13.13-12.89 6.74-6.86 w 13.36-13.11 6.62-6.75 w 16.53-16.22 5.36-5.46 m-s 16.91-16.59 5.24-5.34 w-m 17.24-16.97 5.14-5.22 w 19.28-19.03 4.60-4.66 m-vs 19.62-19.36 4.52-4.58 w-m 21.93-21.39 4.05-4.15 m 22.32-21.87 3.98-4.06 w-m 22.84-22.49 3.89-3.95 w 23.14-22.78 3.84-3.90 w-m 23.39-23.11  3.80-3.845 w-m 23.84-23.45 3.73-3.79 w-m 24.23-23.77 3.67-3.74 m 24.92-24.61  3.57-3.615 m-s 26.35-26.11 3.38-3.41 w-m 26.79-26.35 3.325-3.38  w-m 27.38-26.79 3.255-3.325 m-s 29.06-28.49 3.07-3.13 m-s 29.50-28.97 3.025-3.08  m 31.70-30.97  2.82-2.885 w-m 32.00-31.36 2.795-2.85  m 33.34-32.72 2.685-2.735 w-m 34.33-34.02  2.61-2.633 w-m

Another embodiment of the invention is a process for preparing the crystalline metallophosphate molecular sieve described above. The process comprises forming a reaction mixture containing reactive sources of R, A, M, E and P and heating the reaction mixture at a temperature of about 60° C. to about 200° C. for a time sufficient to form the molecular sieve, the reaction mixture having a composition expressed in terms of mole ratios of the oxides of: aR2/pO:bA2O:cMO:E2O3:dP2O5:eH2O where “a” has a value of about 2.1 to about 100, “b” has a value of about 0.1 to about 8.0, “c” has a value of about 0.25 to about 8, “d” has a value of about 1.69 to about 25, and “e” has a value from 30 to 5000.

Yet another embodiment of the invention is a hydrocarbon conversion process using the above-described molecular sieve as a catalyst. The process comprises contacting at least one hydrocarbon with the molecular sieve at conversion conditions to generate at least one converted hydrocarbon.

Still another embodiment of the invention is a separation process using the crystalline PST-16 material. The process may involve separating mixtures of molecular species or removing contaminants by contacting a fluid with the PST-16 molecular sieve. Separation of molecular species can be based either on the molecular size (kinetic diameter) or on the degree of polarity of the molecular species. Removing contaminants may be by ion exchange with the molecular sieve.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

Applicants have prepared a family of high charge density crystalline microporous metallophosphate compositions with the CGS topology, designated PST-16. Compared to other early MeAPO materials, the PST-16 family of materials contains much more M²⁺ and exhibits high framework (FW) charge densities that unlike the other MeAPOs use of alkali cations in addition to organoammonium ions to balance the FW charge. The instant microporous crystalline material (PST-16) has an empirical composition in the as-synthesized form and on an anhydrous basis expressed by the empirical formula: Rp+rA+mM2+xEyPOz where A is at least one alkali cation and is selected from the group of alkali metals. Specific examples of the A cations include but are not limited to lithium, sodium, potassium, rubidium, cesium and mixtures thereof. R is at least one quaternary ammonium cation, examples of which include but are not limited to ethyltrimethylammonium (ETMA⁺), diethyldimethylammonium (DEDMA⁺), hexamethonium (RM²⁺), choline [Me₃NCH₂CH₂OH]⁺, trimethylpropylammonium, trimethylbutylammonium, trimethylisopropylammonium, tetramethylammonium (TMA⁺), tetraethylammonium (TEA⁺), tetrapropylammonium (TPA⁺) and mixtures thereof, and “r” is the mole ratio of R to P and varies from about 0.1 to about 1.0, while “p” is the weighted average valence of R and varies from about 1 to 2. M and E are tetrahedrally coordinated and in the framework, M is a divalent element selected from the group of Zn, Mg, Co, Mn and mixtures thereof, while E is a trivalent element selected from aluminum and gallium and mixtures thereof. The value of “m” is the mole ratio of A to P and varies from 0.1 to about 1.0, “x” is mole ratio of M to P and varies from 0.2 to about 0.9, while the ratio of E to P is represented by “y” which varies from about 0.10 to about 0.8. Lastly, “z” is the mole ratio of O to P and is given by the equation: z=(m+r·p+3·x+3·y+5)/2. When only one type of R quaternary ammonium cation is present, then the weighted average valence is just the valence of that cation, e.g., +1 or +2. When more than one R cation is present, the total amount of R is given by the equation: R _(r) ^(p+) =R _(r1) ^((p1)+) +R _(r2) ^((p2)+) +R _(r3) ^((p3)+)+ the weighted average valence “p” is given by:

$p = \frac{{r\;{1 \cdot p}\; 1} + {r\;{2 \cdot p}\; 2} + {r\;{3 \cdot p}\; 3} + \ldots}{{r\; 1} + {r\; 2} + {r\; 3} + \ldots}$

It has also been noted that in the PST-16 materials of this invention that a portion of M²⁺ may also reside in the pores, likely in a charge balancing role.

The microporous crystalline metallophosphate PST-16 is prepared by a hydrothermal crystallization of a reaction mixture prepared by combining reactive sources of R, A, E, phosphorous and M. A preferred form of the PST-16 materials is when E is Al. The sources of aluminum include but are not limited to aluminum alkoxides, precipitated aluminas, aluminum metal, aluminum hydroxide, aluminum salts, alkali aluminates and alumina sols. Specific examples of aluminum alkoxides include, but are not limited to aluminum ortho sec-butoxide and aluminum ortho isopropoxide. Sources of phosphorus include, but are not limited to, orthophosphoric acid, phosphorus pentoxide, and ammonium dihydrogen phosphate. Sources of M include but are not limited to zinc acetate, zinc chloride, cobalt acetate, cobalt chloride, magnesium acetate, magnesium nitrate, manganese sulfate, manganese acetate and manganese nitrate. Sources of the other E elements include but are not limited to precipitated gallium hydroxide, gallium chloride, gallium sulfate or gallium nitrate. Sources of the A metals include the halide salts, nitrate salts, hydroxide salts, acetate salts, and sulfate salts of the respective alkali metals. R is at least one quaternary ammonium cation selected from the group consisting of ETMA⁺, DEDMA⁺, HM²⁺, choline, trimethylpropylammonium, trimethylisopropylammonium, trimethylbutylammonium, TMA⁺, tetraethylammonium (TEA⁺), tetrapropylammonium (TPA⁺) and mixtures thereof, and the sources include the hydroxide, chloride, bromide, iodide and fluoride compounds. Specific examples include without limitation ethyltrimethylammonium hydroxide, ethyltrimethylammonium chloride, diethyldimethylammonium chloride, diethyldimethylammonium hydroxide, hexamethonium dihydroxide, hexamethonium dichloride, choline hydroxide, choline chloride, trimethylisopropylammonium hydroxide, propyltrimethylammonium chloride and tetramethylammonium bromide. In one embodiment R is ETMA⁺. In another embodiment, R is diethyldimethylammonium. In yet another embodiment, R is tetraethylammonium. Finally, R may also be a combination of ETMA⁺ and at least one organoammonium cation selected from the group consisting of choline, DEDMA⁺, TMA⁺, HM²⁺, trimethylpropylammonium, trimethylisopropylammonium, trimethylbutylammonium, TEA⁺, and TPA⁺.

The reaction mixture containing reactive sources of the desired components can be described in terms of molar ratios of the oxides by the formula: aR_(2/p)O:bA₂O:cMO:E₂O₃:dP₂O₅:eH₂O where “a” varies from about 2.1 to about 100, “b” varies from about 0.1 to about 8, “c” varies from about 0.25 to about 8, “d” varies from about 1.69 to about 25, and “e’ varies from 30 to 5000. If alkoxides are used, it is preferred to include a distillation or evaporative step to remove the alcohol hydrolysis products. The reaction mixture is now reacted at a temperature of about 60° C. to about 200° C. and preferably from about 95° C. to about 175° C. for a period of about 1 day to about 3 weeks and more preferably for a time of about 1 day to about 7 days in a sealed reaction vessel at autogenous pressure. After crystallization is complete, the solid product is isolated from the heterogeneous mixture by means such as filtration or centrifugation, and then washed with deionized water and dried in air at ambient temperature up to about 100° C. PST-16 seeds can optionally be added to the reaction mixture in order to accelerate or otherwise enhance the formation of the desired microporous composition.

The PST-16 metallophosphate-based material, which is obtained from the above-described process, is characterized by the x-ray diffraction pattern, having at least the d-spacings and relative intensities set forth in Table A below.

TABLE A 2Θ d(Å) I/I₀ % 8.28-8.06 10.67-10.96 vs 10.83-10.64 8.16-8.31 w 11.68-11.47 7.57-7.71 w-m 12.49-12.15 7.08-7.28 m-vs 13.13-12.89 6.74-6.86 w 13.36-13.11 6.62-6.75 w 16.53-16.22 5.36-5.46 m-s 16.91-16.59 5.24-5.34 w-m 17.24-16.97 5.14-5.22 w 19.28-19.03 4.60-4.66 m-vs 19.62-19.36 4.52-4.58 w-m 21.93-21.39 4.05-4.15 m 22.32-21.87 3.98-4.06 w-m 22.84-22.49 3.89-3.95 w 23.14-22.78 3.84-3.90 w-m 23.39-23.11  3.80-3.845 w-m 23.84-23.45 3.73-3.79 w-m 24.23-23.77 3.67-3.74 m 24.92-24.61  3.57-3.615 m-s 26.35-26.11 3.38-3.41 w-m 26.79-26.35 3.325-3.38  w-m 27.38-26.79 3.255-3.325 m-s 29.06-28.49 3.07-3.13 m-s 29.50-28.97 3.025-3.08  m 31.70-30.97  2.82-2.885 w-m 32.00-31.36 2.795-2.85  m 33.34-32.72 2.685-2.735 w-m 34.33-34.02  2.61-2.633 w-m

The PST-16 may be modified in many ways to tailor it for use in a particular application. Modifications include calcination, ammonia calcinations, ion-exchange, steaming, various acid extractions, ammonium hexafluorosilicate treatment, or any combination thereof, some of which are outlined for the case of UZM-4 in U.S. Pat. No. 6,776,975 B1 which is incorporated by reference in its entirety. In addition, properties that may be modified include porosity, adsorption, framework composition, acidity, thermal stability, ion-exchange capacity, etc.

As synthesized, the PST-16 material will contain some of the exchangeable or charge balancing cations in its pores. These exchangeable cations can be exchanged for other cations, or in the case of organic cations, they can be removed by heating under controlled conditions. A preferred method of removing organic cations from the pores is ammonia calcination. Calcination in air converts the organic cations in the pores to protons, which can lead to the loss of some metal, for example Al, from the framework upon exposure to ambient atmospheric water vapor. When the calcination is carried out in an ammonia atmosphere, the organic cation in the pore is replaced by NH4⁺ cation and the framework remains intact (See STUDIES IN SURFACE SCIENCE, (2004) vol. 154, p.1324-1331). Typical conditions for ammonia calcinations include the use of gaseous anhydrous ammonia flowing at a rate of 1.1 l/min while ramping the sample temperature at 5° C./min to 500° C. and holding at that temperature for a time ranging from 5 minutes to an hour. The resulting ammonium/alkali form of PST-16 has essentially the diffraction pattern of Table A. Once in this form, the ammonia calcined material may be ion-exchanged with H⁺, NH₄ ⁺, alkali metals, alkaline earth metals, transition metals, rare earth metals, or any mixture thereof, to achieve a wide variety of compositions with the PST-16 framework in superior condition.

When PST-16 or its modified forms are calcined in air, there can be a loss of metal from the framework, such as Al, which can alter the x-ray diffraction pattern from that observed for the as-synthesized PST-16 (See STUDIES IN SURFACE SCIENCE, (2004) vol. 154, p.1324-1331). Typical conditions for the calcination of the PST-16 sample include ramping the temperature from room temperature to a calcination temperature of 400° to 600° C., preferably a calcination temperature of 450° to 550° C. at a ramp rate of 1 to 5° C./min, preferably a ramp rate of 2 to 4° C./min, the temperature ramp conducted in an atmosphere consisting either of flowing nitrogen or flowing clean dry air, preferably an atmosphere of flowing nitrogen. Once at the desired calcination temperature, if the calcination atmosphere employed during the temperature ramp is flowing clean dry air, it may remain flowing clean dry air. If the calcination atmosphere during the ramp was flowing nitrogen, it may remain flowing nitrogen at the calcination temperature or it may be immediately converted to clean dry air; preferably at the calcination temperature the calcination atmosphere will remain flowing nitrogen for a period of 1-10 hours and preferably for a period of 2-4 hours before converting the calcination atmosphere to flowing clean dry air. The final step of the calcination is a dwell at the calcination temperature in clean dry air. Whether the calcination atmosphere during the initial temperature ramp was flowing nitrogen or flowing clean dry air, once at the calcination temperature and once the calcination atmosphere is clean dry air, the PST-16 sample will spend a period of 1-24 hours and preferably a period of 2-6 hours under these conditions to complete the calcination process.

Methods used to exchange one cation for another are well known in the art and involve contacting the microporous compositions with a solution containing the desired cation (at molar excess) at exchange conditions. Exchange conditions include a temperature of about 15° C. to about 100° C. and a time of about 20 minutes to about 50 hours. Although not preferred, the organic cation can first be removed by heating under controlled conditions.

The crystalline PST-16 materials of this invention can be used for separating mixtures of molecular species, removing contaminants through ion exchange and catalyzing various hydrocarbon conversion processes. Separation of molecular species can be based either on the molecular size (kinetic diameter) or on the degree of polarity of the molecular species.

PST-16 materials of this invention can be used for separating mixtures of molecular species, removing contaminants through ion exchange and catalyzing various hydrocarbon conversion processes. Separation of molecular species can be based either on the molecular size (kinetic diameter) or on the degree of polarity of the molecular species.

The PST-16 compositions of this invention can also be used as a catalyst or catalyst support in various hydrocarbon conversion processes. Hydrocarbon conversion processes are well known in the art and include cracking, hydrocracking, alkylation of both aromatics and isoparaffin, isomerization, polymerization, reforming, hydrogenation, dehydrogenation, transalkylation, dealkylation, hydration, dehydration, hydrotreating, hydrodenitrogenation, hydrodesulfurization, methanol to olefins, methanation and syngas shift process. Specific reaction conditions and the types of feeds which can be used in these processes are set forth in U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,310,440, 4,440,871 and 5,126,308, which are incorporated by reference. Preferred hydrocarbon conversion processes are those in which hydrogen is a component such as hydrotreating or hydrofining, hydrogenation, hydrocracking, hydrodenitrogenation, hydrodesulfurization, etc.

Hydrocracking conditions typically include a temperature in the range of 400° to 1200° F. (204-649° C.), preferably between 600° and 950° F. (316-510° C.). Reaction pressures are in the range of atmospheric to about 3,500 psig (24,132 kPa g), preferably between 200 and 3000 psig (1379-20,685 kPa g). Contact times usually correspond to liquid hourly space velocities (LHSV) in the range of about 0.1 hr⁻¹ to 15 hr⁻¹, preferably between about 0.2 and 3 hr⁻¹. Hydrogen circulation rates are in the range of 1,000 to 50,000 standard cubic feet (scf) per barrel of charge (178-8,888 std. m³/m³), preferably between 2,000 and 30,000 scf per barrel of charge (355-5,333 std. m³/m³). Suitable hydrotreating conditions are generally within the broad ranges of hydrocracking conditions set out above.

The reaction zone effluent is normally removed from the catalyst bed, subjected to partial condensation and vapor-liquid separation and then fractionated to recover the various components thereof. The hydrogen, and if desired some or all of the unconverted heavier materials, are recycled to the reactor. Alternatively, a two-stage flow may be employed with the unconverted material being passed into a second reactor. Catalysts of the subject invention may be used in just one stage of such a process or may be used in both reactor stages.

Catalytic cracking processes are preferably carried out with the PST-16 composition using feedstocks such as gas oils, heavy naphthas, deasphalted crude oil residua, etc. with gasoline being the principal desired product. Temperature conditions of 850° to 1100° F. (455° C. to 593° C.), LHSV values of 0.5 hr ⁻¹ to 10 hr⁻¹ and pressure conditions of from about 0 to 50 psig (0-345 kPa) are suitable.

Alkylation of aromatics usually involves reacting an aromatic (C₂ to C₁₂), especially benzene, with a monoolefin to produce a linear alkyl substituted aromatic. The process is carried out at an aromatic: olefin (e.g., benzene:olefin) ratio of between 5:1 and 30:1, a LHSV of about 0.3 to about 6 hr⁻¹, a temperature of about 100° to about 250° C. and pressures of about 200 to about 1000 psig (1,379-6,895 kPa). Further details on apparatus may be found in U.S. Pat. No. 4,870,222 which is incorporated by reference.

Alkylation of isoparaffins with olefins to produce alkylates suitable as motor fuel components is carried out at temperatures of −30° to 40° C., pressures from about atmospheric to about 6,894 kPa (1,000 psig) and a weight hourly space velocity (WHSV) of 0.1 hr^(−l)to about 120 hr⁻¹. Details on paraffin alkylation may be found in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,157,196 and 5,157,197, which are incorporated by reference.

The conversion of methanol to olefins is effected by contacting the methanol with the PST-16 catalyst at conversion conditions, thereby forming the desired olefins. The methanol can be in the liquid or vapor phase with the vapor phase being preferred. Contacting the methanol with the PST-16 catalyst can be done in a continuous mode or a batch mode with a continuous mode being preferred. The amount of time that the methanol is in contact with the PST-16 catalyst must be sufficient to convert the methanol to the desired light olefin products. When the process is carried out in a batch process, the contact time varies from about 0.001 hrs to about 1 hr and preferably from about 0.01 hr to about 1.0 hr. The longer contact times are used at lower temperatures while shorter times are used at higher temperatures. Further, when the process is carried out in a continuous mode, the Weight Hourly Space Velocity (WHSV) based on methanol can vary from about 1 hr⁻¹ to about 1000 hr⁻¹ and preferably from about 1 hr⁻¹ to about 100 hr⁻¹.

Generally, the process must be carried out at elevated temperatures in order to form light olefins at a fast enough rate. Thus, the process should be carried out at a temperature of about 300° C. to about 600° C., preferably from about 400° C. to about 550° C. and most preferably from about 450° C. to about 525° C. The process may be carried out over a wide range of pressure including autogenous pressure. Thus, the pressure can vary from about 0 kPa (0 psig) to about 1724 kPa (250 psig) and preferably from about 34 kPa (5 psig) to about 345 kPa (50 psig).

Optionally, the methanol feedstock may be diluted with an inert diluent in order to more efficiently convert the methanol to olefins. Examples of the diluents which may be used are helium, argon, nitrogen, carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, hydrogen, steam, paraffinic hydrocarbons, e.g., methane, aromatic hydrocarbons, e.g., benzene, toluene and mixtures thereof. The amount of diluent used can vary considerably and is usually from about 5 to about 90 mole percent of the feedstock and preferably from about 25 to about 75 mole percent.

The actual configuration of the reaction zone may be any well-known catalyst reaction apparatus known in the art. Thus, a single reaction zone or a number of zones arranged in series or parallel may be used. In such reaction zones the methanol feedstock is flowed through a bed containing the PST-16 catalyst. When multiple reaction zones are used, one or more PST-16 catalysts may be used in series to produce the desired product mixture. Instead of a fixed bed, a dynamic bed system, e.g., fluidized or moving, may be used. Such a dynamic system would facilitate any regeneration of the PST-16 catalyst that may be required. If regeneration is required, the PST-16 catalyst can be continuously introduced as a moving bed to a regeneration zone where it can be regenerated by means such as oxidation in an oxygen containing atmosphere to remove carbonaceous materials.

The following examples are presented in illustration of this invention and are not intended as undue limitations on the generally broad scope of the invention as set out in the appended claims. The products of this invention are designated with the general name PST-16, with the understanding that all of the PST-16 materials exhibit a structure with the CGS topology.

The structure of the PST-16 compositions of this invention was determined by x-ray analysis. The x-ray patterns presented in the following examples were obtained using standard x-ray powder diffraction techniques. The radiation source was a high-intensity, x-ray tube operated at 45 kV and 35 mA. The diffraction pattern from the copper K-alpha radiation was obtained by appropriate computer based techniques. Flat compressed powder samples were continuously scanned at 2° to 56° (2θ). Interplanar spacings (d) in Angstrom units were obtained from the position of the diffraction peaks expressed as θ where θ is the Bragg angle as observed from digitized data. Intensities were determined from the integrated area of diffraction peaks after subtracting background, “I_(o)” being the intensity of the strongest line or peak, and “I” being the intensity of each of the other peaks.

As will be understood by those skilled in the art the determination of the parameter 2θ is subject to both human and mechanical error, which in combination can impose an uncertainty of about ±0.4° on each reported value of 2θ. This uncertainty is, of course, also manifested in the reported values of the d-spacings, which are calculated from the 2θ values. This imprecision is general throughout the art and is not sufficient to preclude the differentiation of the present crystalline materials from each other and from the compositions of the prior art. In some of the x-ray patterns reported, the relative intensities of the d-spacings are indicated by the notations vs, s, m, and w which represent very strong, strong, medium, and weak, respectively. In terms of 100×I/I₀, the above designations are defined as: w=0-15; m=15-60: s=60-80 and vs=80-100

In certain instances the purity of a synthesized product may be assessed with reference to its x-ray powder diffraction pattern. Thus, for example, if a sample is stated to be pure, it is intended only that the x-ray pattern of the sample is free of lines attributable to crystalline impurities, not that there are no amorphous materials present.

In order to more fully illustrate the invention, the following examples are set forth. It is to be understood that the examples are only by way of illustration and are not intended as an undue limitation on the broad scope of the invention as set forth in the appended claims.

EXAMPLE 1

A Teflon beaker was charged with 150 g ethyltrimethylammonium hydroxide (ETMAOH, 20%, SACHEM, Inc.) and placed under a high speed stirrer. Aluminum isopropoxide (Al(OiPr)₃, 13.3% Al, Sigma-Aldrich) was pre-ground in a mortar and 5.79 g was dissolved in the ETMAOH solution with stirring. This was followed by the dropwise addition of 19.57 g H₃PO₄ (85.7%, Sigma-Aldrich). The reaction mixture was allowed to stir. Separately, 6.26 g Zn(OAc)₂*2 H₂O was dissolved in 25.00 g de-ionized water. This solution was added dropwise to the reaction mixture. Then 1.06 g KCl was dissolved in 35.00 g de-ionized water and added dropwise to the reaction mixture with stirring. The reaction mixture was distributed among 7 Teflon-lined autoclaves and digested at 95, 125, 150, and 175° C. at autogenous pressure for 44 and 165 hr. The solid products were isolated by centrifugation and washed with de-ionized water. The products from the 95, 125 and 150° C. digestions were identified as PST-16 with the CGS by powder x-ray diffraction. Table 1 below shows the representative diffraction lines for the product digested at 150° C. for 44 hr. Elemental analysis showed this product was composed of the elemental ratios C/N=5.31, Al/P=0.51, Zn/P=0.53, K/P=0.25 and N/P=0.23, consistent with the stoichiometry ETMA_(0.23)K_(0.25)Zn_(0.53)Al_(0.51)P.

TABLE 1 2-Θ d(Å) I/I₀(%) 8.20 10.78 vs 10.72 8.24 w 11.56 7.65 w 12.38 7.14 m 13.02 6.80 w 13.25 6.68 w 16.42 5.39 s 16.81 5.27 w 17.17 5.16 w 19.16 4.63 m 19.40 4.57 m 19.54 4.54 m 21.30 4.17 w 21.56 4.12 m 21.76 4.08 m 22.18 4.00 m 22.72 3.91 w 23.00 3.86 w 23.26 3.82 w 23.72 3.75 w 24.10 3.69 m 24.798 3.59 m 26.26 3.39 w 26.68 3.34 w 27.22 3.27 m 27.92 3.19 m 28.92 3.08 m 29.34 3.04 m 30.34 2.94 w 30.66 2.91 w 31.48 2.84 m 31.78 2.81 m 33.18 2.70 w 34.20 2.62 w

EXAMPLE 2

A Teflon beaker was charged with 150.00 g ETMAOH (20%) and placed under a high speed stirrer. Aluminum isopropoxide (13.3% Al) was pre-ground in a mortar. The Al(OiPr)₃, 5.79 g, was then dissolved in the stirring ETMAOH solution. This was followed by the dropwise addition of 19.57 g H₃PO₄ (85.7%), again with stirring. Separately, 6.26 g Zn(OAc)₂*2 H₂O was dissolved in 30.03 g de-ionized water and added fast dropwise to the stirring reaction mixture. Then 2.82 g KOAc (99.4%) was dissolved in 30.10 g de-ionized water and added dropwise to the reaction mixture. The reaction mixture was distributed among 7 Teflon-lined autoclaves and digested at autogenous pressures at temperatures of 95, 125, 150, and 175° C., for either 46 or 165 hr or both. The solid products were isolated by centrifugation and washed with de-ionized water. The sample from the 95° C/165 hr digestion was identified as PST-16 with the CGS topology by powder x-ray diffraction, the representative diffraction lines of which are shown in Table 2 below. Elemental analysis showed this product was composed of the elemental ratios C/N=5.06, Al/P=0.43, Zn/P=0.60, K/P=0.41, and N/P=0.16, consistent with the stoichiometry ETMA_(0.16)K_(0.41)Zn_(0.60)Al_(0.43)P.

TABLE 2 2-Θ d(Å) I/I₀(%) 8.20 10.78 vs 10.74 8.23 w 11.54 7.66 m 12.38 7.14 s 13.02 6.80 w 13.22 6.69 w 16.44 5.39 m 16.78 5.28 w 17.16 5.16 w 17.56 5.05 w 19.14 4.63 m 19.56 4.54 m 20.54 4.32 w 21.58 4.11 m 21.78 4.08 m 22.18 4.00 m 22.74 3.91 w 23.02 3.86 m 23.24 3.82 w 23.74 3.75 w 24.10 3.69 m 24.82 3.58 m 26.24 3.39 m 26.66 3.34 w 27.24 3.27 s 27.82 3.20 m 28.94 3.08 s 29.34 3.04 m 30.36 2.94 m 30.70 2.91 w 31.52 2.84 m 31.84 2.81 m 32.62 2.74 m 33.20 2.70 m 33.68 2.66 w 33.98 2.64 w 34.22 2.62 m 34.68 2.58 w 35.04 2.56 m

EXAMPLE 3

A Teflon beaker was charged with 130.00 g ETMAOH (20%) and placed under a high speed stirrer. Aluminum isopropoxide (13.3% Al) was pre-ground in a mortar and 6.27 g was dissolved in the ETMAOH solution. Then 21.20 g H₃PO₄ (85.7%) was added dropwise while stirring continued. Separately, 6.78 g Zn(OAc)₂*2 H₂O was dissolved in 30.39 g de-ionized water. This solution was added dropwise to the reaction mixture. Next, 1.53 g KOAc (99.4%) was dissolved in 25.00 g de-ionized water and the resulting solution added dropwise to the reaction mixture. Vigorous stirring was required to thin out the reaction mixture. The reaction mixture was distributed among 7 Teflon-lined autoclaves and digested at temperatures of 95, 125, 150, and 175° C., for either 41 or 172 hr or both at autogenous pressures. The solid products were isolated by centrifugation and washed with de-ionized water. All seven of the products were identified as PST-16 with the CGS topology by powder x-ray diffraction. The representative diffraction lines for the 150° C. product digested for 172 hr are shown in Table 3 below. Elemental analysis showed this product was composed of the elemental ratios C/N=5.06, Al/P=0.53, Zn/P=0.48, K/P=0.24, and N/P=0.24, consistent with the stoichiometry ETMA_(0.24)K_(0.24)Zn_(0.48)Al_(0.53)P.

TABLE 3 2-Θ d(Å) I/I₀(%) 8.20 10.78 vs 10.74 8.23 w 11.58 7.64 m 12.38 7.14 m 13.00 6.80 w 13.24 6.68 w 16.42 5.39 m 16.80 5.27 m 17.12 5.17 w 19.16 4.63 vs 19.38 4.58 vs, sh 19.52 4.54 m 20.56 4.32 w 21.34 4.16 w 21.78 4.08 m 22.16 4.01 m 22.74 3.91 w 23.00 3.86 m 23.26 3.82 m 23.72 3.75 m 24.08 3.69 m 24.80 3.59 m 26.26 3.39 m 26.66 3.34 m 27.18 3.28 m 28.18 3.16 w 28.94 3.08 m 29.32 3.04 m 30.34 2.94 m 30.70 2.91 m 31.52 2.84 m 31.72 2.82 m 32.30 2.77 w 32.74 2.73 w 33.18 2.70 m 33.68 2.66 w 34.22 2.62 m 34.68 2.58 w 35.02 2.56 m 35.58 2.52 w

EXAMPLE 4

A Teflon beaker was charged with 145.00 g diethyldimethylammonium hydroxide (DEDMAOH, 20% aqueous, SACHEM, Inc.) and placed under a high-speed stirring apparatus. Pre-ground aluminum isopropoxide (13.2% Al) was added and dissolved with stirring. This was followed by the fast dropwise addition of 16.69 g H₃PO₄ (85.7%). Separately, 5.34 g Zn(OAc)₂*2H₂O was dissolved in 25.00 g de-ionized water. This solution was added to the reaction mixture dropwise and intermittently. An additional solution was prepared by dissolving 1.19 g KOAc (99.4%) in 12.44 g de-ionized water, which was added dropwise to the reaction mixture. The mixture was allowed to stir and then was distributed among 7 Teflon-lined autoclaves which were digested at temperatures of 95, 125, 150, and 175° C., for either 48 or 181 hr or both at autogenous pressures. The solid products were isolated by centrifugation and washed with de-ionized water. The products isolated from the 181 hr digestions at 95° C. and 125° C. were identified as PST-16 with the CGS topology by powder x-ray diffraction. The representative diffraction lines for the product from the 125° C/181 hr digestion are shown in Table 4 below. Elemental analysis showed this product was composed of the elemental ratios C/N=5.42, Al/P=0.48, Zn/P=0.50, K/P=0.26, and N/P=0.25, consistent with the stoichiometry DEDMA_(0.25)K_(0.26)Zn_(0.50)Al_(0.48)P.

TABLE 4 2-Θ d(Å) I/I₀(%) 8.14 10.86 vs 10.71 8.26 w 11.54 7.66 w 12.25 7.22 m 12.96 6.82 w 13.18 6.71 w 16.28 5.44 m 16.68 5.31 w 17.05 5.20 w 19.10 4.64 m 19.42 4.57 w 21.26 4.18 w 21.52 4.13 m 21.98 4.04 w 22.58 3.93 w 22.88 3.88 m 23.22 3.83 w 23.53 3.78 w 23.88 3.72 m 24.12 3.69 w 24.70 3.60 m 26.18 3.40 m 26.48 3.36 w 26.92 3.31 m 28.07 3.18 w 28.64 3.11 m 29.08 3.07 m 30.15 2.96 w 30.42 2.94 w 30.67 2.91 w 31.14 2.87 w 31.52 2.84 m 32.56 2.75 w 32.86 2.72 w 33.72 2.66 w 34.12 2.63 m 34.78 2.58 w 35.02 2.56 w

EXAMPLE 5

A Teflon beaker was charged with 116.00 g DEDMAOH (20%) and placed under a high-speed stirring apparatus. With stirring, the solution was diluted with 25.64 g de-ionized water. Pre-ground aluminum isopropoxide (13.2% Al), 4.97 g, was added and dissolved in the hydroxide solution. This was followed by the dropwise addition of 16.69 g H₃PO₄ (85.7%). Separately, 5.34 g Zn(OAc)₂*2H₂O was dissolved in 25.00 g de-ionized water. This solution was added dropwise to the stirring reaction mixture. Another solution was prepared by dissolving 1.19 g KOAc (99.4%) in 25.00 g de-ionized water. This was added dropwise to the reaction mixture while continuing the stirring. The reaction mixture was homogenized further before it was distributed among 7 Teflon-lined autoclaves, which were digested at temperatures of 95, 125, 150, and 175° C., for either 48 or 170 hr or both at autogenous pressures. The solid products were isolated by centrifugation and washed with de-ionized water. The products isolated from all of the digestions were identified as PST-16 with the CGS topology by powder x-ray diffraction. The representative diffraction lines for the product from the 125° C/48 hr digestion are shown in Table 5 below. Elemental analysis showed this product was composed of the elemental ratios C/N=5.53, Al/P=0.49, Zn/P=0.50, K/P=0.25, and N/P=0.23, consistent with the stoichiometry DEDMA_(0.23)K_(0.25)Zn_(0.50)Al_(0.49)P.

TABLE 5 2-Θ d(Å) I/I₀(%) 8.20 10.78 100 10.76 8.22 w 11.60 7.62 m 12.33 7.17 m 13.04 6.79 w 13.28 6.66 w 16.38 5.41 m 16.74 5.29 w 17.10 5.18 w 19.20 4.62 m 19.50 4.55 m 20.58 4.31 w 21.34 4.16 w 21.64 4.10 m 22.04 4.03 w 22.30 3.98 w 22.70 3.91 w 22.94 3.87 w 23.28 3.82 w 23.60 3.77 w 23.79 3.74 w 23.96 3.71 m 24.24 3.67 w 24.80 3.59 m 26.26 3.39 m 26.56 3.35 w 27.00 3.30 m 28.12 3.17 w 28.72 3.11 m 29.14 3.06 m 30.24 2.95 w 30.54 2.93 w 30.71 2.91 w 31.22 2.86 w 31.56 2.83 m 32.96 2.72 w 33.78 2.65 w 34.22 2.62 m 34.90 2.57 m 35.12 2.55 m 35.53 2.52 w

EXAMPLE 6

A Teflon beaker was charged with 126.33 g ETMAOH (20 wt. %) and placed under a high speed overhead stirrer. This was followed by the addition and dissolution of 6.26g of Al(OiPr)₃ (98+%) with stirring. Then 20.79 g of H₃PO₄ (85%) was added slowly while mixing continued. Separately, 6.73 g of zinc acetate dihydrate was dissolved in 30 g of deionized water. The resulting Zn solution was then slowly added to the Al/P/ETMAOH solution while mixing with an overhead stirrer. In a separate beaker, 1.80 g KBr was dissolved in 58.1 g deionized water. This was then added slowly to the reaction mixture while continuing to mix with an overhead stirrer, resulting in a clear solution. The solution was then divided between 4×125 ml Teflon-lined autoclaves and digested for 4 days at 150° C. at autogenous pressure. The solid products were isolated by centrifugation and washed with de-ionized water. Analysis by powder x-ray diffraction showed that all of the reactions resulted in PST-16 products with the CGS topology. Representative diffraction lines for the product are shown in Table 6 below.

TABLE 6 2-Θ d(Å) I/I₀(%) 8.23 10.74 vs 10.76 8.22 w 11.61 7.61 w 12.53 7.06 vs 13.07 6.77 w 13.29 6.66 w 16.47 5.38 m 16.85 5.26 w 17.19 5.15 w 17.48 5.07 w 19.20 4.62 w 19.46 4.56 w 19.58 4.53 w 21.40 4.15 m 21.47 4.13 m 21.59 4.11 m 21.83 4.07 w 22.23 4.00 w 22.76 3.90 w 23.05 3.86 w 23.31 3.81 w 23.77 3.74 w 24.15 3.68 w 24.83 3.58 w 26.29 3.39 w 26.70 3.34 w 27.26 3.27 m 27.92 3.19 m 28.22 3.16 m 28.98 3.08 m 29.39 3.04 w 30.39 2.94 w 30.71 2.91 w 31.59 2.83 w 31.83 2.81 w 32.35 2.76 w 32.63 2.74 w 32.79 2.73 w 33.25 2.69 m 33.41 2.68 m 33.71 2.66 w 34.03 2.63 w 34.27 2.61 w 34.63 2.59 w 

The invention claimed is:
 1. A microporous crystalline metallophosphate material having a three-dimensional framework of [M²⁺O_(4/2)]²⁻, [EO_(4/2)]⁻ and [PO_(4/2)]⁺ tetrahedral units and an empirical composition in the as synthesized form and on an anhydrous basis expressed by an empirical formula of: Rp+rA+mM2+xEyPOz where R is at least one quaternary ammonium cation selected from the group consisting of ethyltrimethylammonium (ETMA⁺), diethyldimethylammonium (DEDMA⁺), hexamethonium (HM²⁺), choline [Me₃NCH₂CH₂OH]⁺, trimethylpropylammonium, trimethylbutylammonium, trimethylisopropylammonium, tetramethylammonium (TMA⁺), tetraethylammonium (TEA⁺), tetrapropylammonium (TPA⁺) and mixtures thereof, “r” is the mole ratio of R to P and has a value of about 0.1 to about 1.0, “p” is the weighted average valence of R and varies from 1 to 2, A is an alkali metal selected from the group consisting of Li⁺, Na⁺, K⁺, Rb⁺and Cs⁺and mixtures thereof, “m” is the mole ratio of A to P and varies from 0.1 to 1.0, M is a divalent element selected from the group of Zn, Mg, Co, Mn and mixtures thereof, “x” is the mole ratio of M to P and varies from 0.2 to about 0.9, E is a trivalent element selected from the group consisting of aluminum and gallium and mixtures thereof, “y” is the mole ratio of E to P and varies from 0.1 to about 0.8 and “z” is the mole ratio of O to P and has a value determined by the equation: z=(m+p·r+2·x+3·y+5)/2 and is characterized in that it has the x-ray diffraction pattern having at least the d-spacings and intensities set forth in Table A: Table A TABLE A 2Θ d(Å) I/I₀ % 8.28-8.06 10.67-10.96 vs 10.83-10.64 8.16-8.31 w 11.68-11.47 7.57-7.71 w-m 12.49-12.15 7.08-7.28 m-vs 13.13-12.89 6.74-6.86 w 13.36-13.11 6.62-6.75 w 16.53-16.22 5.36-5.46 m-s 16.91-16.59 5.24-5.34 w-m 17.24-16.97 5.14-5.22 w 19.28-19.03 4.60-4.66 m-vs 19.62-19.36 4.52-4.58 w-m 21.93-21.39 4.05-4.15 m 22.32-21.87 3.98-4.06 w-m 22.84-22.49 3.89-3.95 w 23.14-22.78 3.84-3.90 w-m 23.39-23.11  3.80-3.845 w-m 23.84-23.45 3.73-3.79 w-m 24.23-23.77 3.67-3.74 m 24.92-24.61  3.57-3.615 m-s 26.35-26.11 3.38-3.41 w-m 26.79-26.35 3.325-3.38  w-m 27.38-26.79 3.255-3.325 m-s 29.06-28.49 3.07-3.13 m-s 29.50-28.97 3.025-3.08  m 31.70-30.97  2.82-2.885 w-m 32.00-31.36 2.795-2.85  m 33.34-32.72 2.685-2.735 w-m 34.33-34.02  2.61-2.633 w-m

wherein said microporous crystalline metallophosphate material is in a modified form and has been modified by a process selected from the group consisting of ammonia calcinations, ion-exchange, or any combination thereof.
 2. The metallophosphate material of claim 1 where A is potassium.
 3. The metallophosphate material of claim 1 where E is aluminum.
 4. The metallophosphate material of claim 1 where R is ethyltrimethylammonium cation, ETMA⁺.
 5. The metallophosphate material of claim 1 where R is the diethyldimethylammonium cation, DEDMA⁺.
 6. The metallophosphate material of claim 1 where R is tetraethylammonium cation, TEA⁺. 